Karnataka HC Challenges Government on Submission of Report in ‘Sealed Cover’ Regarding Stampede

RCB expresses sorrow after deadly stampede incident.
The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday raised concerns regarding the state government’s insistence on keeping its status report about the stampede in a sealed cover, emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability in the investigative process.

During the hearing of the suo motu petition concerning the stampede that resulted in 11 fatalities on June 4, Acting Chief Justice V Kameswar Rao and Justice CM Joshi heard from Advocate General Shashi Kiran Shetty. He stated that the government was not avoiding disclosure but aimed to prevent any prejudice to ongoing inquiries.

“We will present both reports next week,” he mentioned, alluding to the preliminary findings and interim assessments compiled by the state. The AG highlighted that some observations in the report were preliminary and might be sensationalized by the media if disclosed prematurely.
The bench reiterated its stance on considering the issue of keeping the status report sealed and declared its intention to appoint an amicus curiae. Additionally, the court indicated that it would seek the amicus curiae’s assistance before making a decision on the matter.
The court showed a strong preference for transparency and accountability throughout the investigation.

The AG requested a postponement of 20 to 25 days to collect all reports. However, the bench seemed unconvinced. “Why should that limit us?” the court questioned, reiterating that the proceedings were not bound by the state’s internal timelines.

The court also expressed its intention to include the Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA), Royal Challengers Bangalore (RCB), and DNA Networks—three entities involved in the organization and management of the IPL match.

Representatives for various applicants advocated for the public disclosure of the state’s report, asserting that transparency and accountability are crucial.

A counsel, referencing a legal precedent, stated, “A one-sided submission leads to a serious breach of natural justice.” Another added, “Sealed covers foster a culture of opacity.” The bench instructed the counsel seeking increased compensation for victims to submit their application to the Advocate General for the state’s response.

The court ordered that notices be issued to KSCA, RCB, and DNA Networks, designating them as party respondents. The next hearing is scheduled for June 23.

Previous Article

ENG vs IND: Sachin or Virat? Anderson Weighs in on the Harder Batsman to Bowl Against

Next Article

Endurance Tech anticipates consistent growth due to new products and a European partnership.