This latter case has amplified scrutiny on the opaque realm of continuous, speculative transactions. Just last week, an unidentified trader profited over $400,000 by wagering that Maduro would soon be ousted.
Most of the trader’s bets on the platform Polymarket were placed just hours before President Donald Trump announced the unexpected late-night raid that resulted in Maduro’s apprehension, raising online questions about possible insider trading due to the wagers’ timing and the trader’s limited activity on the platform. However, some contend that the risk of being caught is too significant, suggesting that prior speculations about Maduro’s future might have triggered such bets.
Polymarket has not responded to inquiries for comment.
The commercial utilization of prediction markets has surged in recent years, allowing individuals to wager their funds on an expanding list of prospective events. Despite some striking gains, traders continue to incur losses daily. Regarding government oversight in the US, these trades are classified differently from conventional gambling, provoking issues related to transparency and risk.
Read Also: Trump ‘inclined’ to keep ExxonMobil out of Venezuela after CEO response at White House meeting
Here’s what we know:
Prediction markets encompass a vast array of topics—from the intensification of geopolitical strife to pop culture phenomena and even the status of conspiracy theories. Recently, there has been a notable increase in bets concerning elections and sports events. Meanwhile, some users have risked millions on speculative matters such as a rumored—and unfulfilled—“secret finale” for Netflix’s “Stranger Things,” whether the US government will affirm the existence of extraterrestrial life, and how much billionaire Elon Musk may post on social media this month.
In industry jargon, the items bought or sold in a prediction market are referred to as “event contracts.” They are generally presented as “yes” or “no” wagers, with their price fluctuating between $0 and $1, indicating what traders are collectively willing to pay based on the perceived likelihood of an event occurring.
As traders believe an event is more likely to happen, the cost of that contract rises. As the odds evolve over time, users can opt to cash out early to secure small profits or mitigate losses on their investments.
Advocates of prediction markets argue that financial stakes lead to improved forecasting. Experts such as Koleman Strumpf, an economics professor at Wake Forest University, suggest there is merit in monitoring these platforms for potential news, citing prediction markets’ history of success with certain election outcomes, including the 2024 presidential race.
However, he emphasized that they are not infallible; prediction markets can also miss the mark.
The identities behind all this trading remain somewhat unclear. While the firms managing these platforms collect personal details from users to verify identities and transactions, many individuals trade under anonymous aliases online, making it challenging for the public to discern who benefits from various event contracts. In theory, investors may closely track specific events, while others might simply be guessing.
Critics argue that the accessibility and rapid nature of these 24/7 wagers lead to daily financial losses, particularly impacting users who may already be vulnerable to gambling issues. This environment also expands the potential for insider trading.
Polymarket stands as one of the largest prediction markets globally, allowing users to fund event contracts via cryptocurrency, debit or credit cards, and bank transfers.
Restrictions differ by country; however, in the US, the reach of these markets has rapidly widened in recent years, coinciding with shifting political policies. Former President Joe Biden was tough on prediction markets, and after a 2022 settlement with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Polymarket was prohibited from operating in the country.
This situation altered under Trump late last year when Polymarket announced its return to the US after receiving approval from the commission. Users based in America can now join a platform “waitlist.”
In contrast, Polymarket’s main competitor, Kalshi, has been a federally regulated exchange since 2020. The platform provides similar options for buying and selling event contracts and currently allows betting on elections and sports nationwide. Recently, Kalshi received court approval just weeks before the 2024 election to enable Americans to gamble on upcoming political contests and started hosting sports trading about a year ago.
The space is now populated with other prominent players. Sports betting leaders DraftKings and FanDuel both launched prediction platforms last month. Online broker Robinhood is expanding its own services. Additionally, Trump’s social media platform Truth Social has announced plans to offer in-platform prediction markets through a partnership with Crypto.com, and Donald Trump Jr. has advisory roles at both Polymarket and Kalshi.
“The train has left the station on these event contracts; they’re not going away,” remarked Melinda Roth, a visiting associate professor at Washington and Lee University’s School of Law.
Since they market themselves as selling event contracts, prediction markets are regulated by the CFTC, allowing them to bypass state-level limitations or prohibitions on traditional gambling and sports betting.
“It’s a considerable loophole,” stated Karl Lockhart, an assistant professor of law at DePaul University who has studied this domain. “You only need to comply with one set of regulations, rather than (rules from) each state across the nation.”
Sports betting is drawing significant attention. Several major states—like California and Texas—continue to prohibit sports betting, yet individuals can now wager on games, athlete trades, and more through event contracts.
An increasing number of states and tribes are pursuing legal action to halt this. Lawyers predict litigation may ultimately reach the US Supreme Court, especially considering that further regulations from the Trump administration appear unlikely.
Federal law forbids event contracts related to gaming, war, terrorism, and assassinations, as Roth indicated, potentially putting some trades in prediction markets in a precarious position within the US. Nonetheless, users might still find ways to purchase certain contracts while traveling abroad or using different VPNs.
The future actions of the CFTC regarding these issues remain uncertain. Although the agency did not respond to a request for comment, it has already taken steps away from enforcement.
Despite overseeing trillions in the overall US derivatives market, the CFTC is also significantly smaller than the Securities and Exchange Commission. Concurrent with the rapid growth of event contracts on prediction market platforms, there have been reductions in the CFTC’s workforce and a wave of leadership changes under Trump’s second term. Currently, only one of the five commissioner positions at the agency is filled.
Nonetheless, other lawmakers are calling for stronger actions against potential insider trading in prediction markets—especially following the suspicions surrounding last week’s Maduro trade on Polymarket. On Friday, Democratic Rep. Ritchie Torres introduced a bill aimed at limiting government employees’ engagement in politically related event contracts.
This bill has already garnered support from Kalshi CEO Tarek Mansour, who stressed on LinkedIn that insider trading has always been prohibited on his company’s platform, but that more needs to be done to address unregulated prediction markets.
